Tokenization of real assets is one of the most popular use cases in blockchain and DLT.
It is innovative if it is a digital token that allows institutions to manage and unlock assets such as real estate, stocks, goods and debt products to manage and unlock more transparency.
Ether Leeum is recognized as a dominant blockchain for tokenization with the established defect ecosystem and institutional investment through ETF. However, HEDERA HASHGRAPH, supported by the enterprise -rating governance model, is a powerful competitor.
Ether Leeum’s strength in tokenization
Ether Leeum is famous for its No. 1 advantage in the blockchain space and develops ERC-20 and ERC-721 standards, which are used for blockchains through Ether Leeum virtual machine integration and defi.
Ether Lee has planned a blueprint of the disconnection and unexpected tokens that are the basis of the Defi and NFT markets. Organizations that explore token shoes can sometimes start with Ether Leeum due to popular development and marine developer communities.
Many major tokenized government bonds, real estate projects and Starble Lecoin have been issued and started in Ether Leeum. But Ether Lee is faced with continuous tasks.
- ExpansionDespite ETH’s 2 network solutions, Ether Leeum’s basic layer is struggling to handle high transaction processing.
- Gas bill: ETH gas fee fees that cannot be handled can be soaring to three digits in the bull market, which is a problem with mass tokenization projects.
- Final time: Ether Lee’s settlement finals are slower than HEDERA ‘S, introducing friction for real -time applications.
Ether Lee’s ecosystem cannot compare the width of the defect, but the structural limitations of the network are questioned whether they can efficiently support the large -scale tokenization of RWA at the institutional level.
Hedera’s strength in actual asset token shoes
HEDERA HASHGRAPH approaches token shoes differently, focusing on the adoption of efficiency, security and enterprise after the concept.
HEDERA’s ABFT agreement mechanism provides resistance to fast finalism, high throughput and network attacks, including future evidence for quantum threats.
In the case of tokenization, the financial market wants to use immediate and transparent settlements, so these features are important for institutional adoption.
HEDERA’s overall strengths are:
- Extended performance: Hedera can handle thousands of transactions per second with almost incomplete agreement. This scale is ideal for tokenizing mass assets, such as bonds or payments.
- Prediction at costUnlike ETH, HEDERA offers a very low transaction fee, allowing companies to predict costs and operate large tokenization systems more easily.
- Corporate governance: HEDERA ‘S Council includes large -scale companies such as Google, IBM, Standard Bank and Arrow Electronics. This governance structure ensures that the organs will develop in a transparent manner and the network.
HEDERA positions itself as an alternative network for building a regulated financial infrastructure. We have regulated financial stocks with recent partnerships, arrow electronic devices with DOVU, supply chains and swarm markets.
Recently, LLOYDS BANK token the British Money Market Fund using HEDERA HASHGRAPH, while the Australian preliminary bank chose HEDERA as part of CBDC’s project acacia. Such partnerships emphasize the scaffolding in Hedera’s corporate tokenization.
Can Hedera Hashgraph win Ethereum?
By comparing HBAR and ETH in the tokenization journey, you can go down to two elements that contain each ecosystem maturity and institutional adoption rate.
Ether Lee has an advantage as an Ecosystem maturity and has a deep liquidity grass that can trade tokenized assets with a large developer community with ETH’s Defi protocol. Since the institution can create value when assets are liquid and interoperable, these network functions are important.
HEDERA’s guidelines for institutional grade tokenization are improved by governance models, network extensions, problems faced by Etherrium, for example, extension, gas fee prediction and finality.
If RWA’s tokenization evolves into a corporate -oriented industry that the United States can do, Hedera can take advantage of the regulations.
Another factor is recognition and trust. Ether Leeum is innovative, but some regulators are still considered a retail -oriented experimental ecosystem. HEDERA brands brands with enterprise -prepared DLTs with the best companies related to governance.
HBAR’s reliability can be more comfortable for governments, banks and multinational companies to be tokenized in HEDERA, not Ether Leeum.
I am looking for HBAR and ETH in advance
Hedera is unlikely to completely “replace” the current Ether Leeum, but HBAR can overtake Ethereum as soon as possible when the adoption of HEDERA is accelerated.
More realistically, the two networks can coexist, and Ether Lee is focusing on the retail -centered tokenization market, and HEDERA is regulated and a network for the use of large -scale institutions.
If the future of tokenization is defined by institutional adoption, compliance and scalability, Hedera is likely to surpass Ethereum to token the actual assets. The next few years will be interesting.