Ripple XRP and RLUSD aim to serve as bridges for financial institutions and companies to promote transactions between borders at low fees and innovative speeds.
SWIFT is a communication network between global banks where safe and efficient communication can be made between banking institutions around the world.
Knowing the partnership with SWIFT’s ChainLink, the crowds point out that they can bypass Ripple using Link’s CCIP (crosschain interoperability protocol) and provide safe communication between Web3 and traditional banking system. Should I worry about Ripple?
Quick Chain Link Partnership: Where does Ripple fit?
The CCIP messaging interface of ChainLink makes the blockchain network effectively and safely communicating with each other, making cross chain communication simplicity and simple.


The cross -chain interoperability with the chain link technology has become an industrial standard for the cryptocurrency industry with application developers, blockchain networks and Web3 systems that integrate CCIP for cross chain communication.
For Swift, CCIP of Chainlink can help block blockchain and existing financial systems to communicate with each other smoothly.
The rapid integration of the chain link can also be transferred to an asset token between the bank and the blockchain. STABLECOINS and various digital assets can be transferred to a chain system using Swift and CCIP from banks to connect Web2 and Web3 financial systems.
SWIFT’s CCIP integration has made Ripple’s XRP token almost overlapping with bridge assets, and Swift can only rely on ChainLink’s communication protocols.
SWIFT’s ability to achieve financial connection goals by cooperating with chain links and ignoring other third parties has made the XRP holder questions the possibility of Swift’s decision.
In mind, how can Ripple Combat Chainlink maintain a foothold in blockchain network and global banking communication?
What can Ripple XRP and Swift: Ripple do?
XRP is designed as a bridge currency between financial banking institutions and blockchain technology to promote transactions between borders.
ChainLink’s CCIP uses XRP for liquidity and currency settlement because swift can easily integrate chainlink’s technology.
Before this, there are many ways to take Ripple ahead of Chainlink’s CCIP partnership and to maintain the relevance of XRP in discussions on the agreement between borders.
To this end, Ripple can use regulations on US laws and international policies. Bank systems prefer to use completely regulated protocols for unprotected protocols.
Ripple -on -demand liquidity (ODL)
Ripple’s on -demand liquidity solution enables agreement with low fees with XRP. Compared to Swift, Ripple’s payment system is much more simplified, faster and cheaper that banks can consider.
Ripple XRP in emerging markets
Ripple’s ability aimed at emerging markets will also help to gain greater benefits. In Africa, South America and Asia, the banking system is weak and the demand for border payments is very high, so you can benefit from Ripple’s solutions.
Immediate border liquidity
The XRP can immediately have liquidity between the border without a preliminary funding account or special effect. If institutional players and business integrate Ripple, the network itself will be more powerful and challenging for CCIP.
Round: Ripple XRP Cross Border Border Payment to Chain Link
Many spectators do not think that swift can bypass it using Ripple XRP for interoperability and border payment systems, but Ripple still gains benefits.
By taking advantage of the speed, low commission, durability and custom liquidity of XRP, financial institutions will choose Ripple as a solution for global border transactions.
When the SEC finally dropped out the case of Ripple, the XRP token became one of the most regulatory cryptocurrencies in the market. If you use multiple ETFs for approval, Ripple may not have difficulty competing.